Fusionism, Religion and the Tea Party

Emanuel-Mihail Socaciu, Radu-Bogdan Uszkai

Abstract


This article aims to explore two different but interrelated problems. The first objective, the more abstract one, is to discuss the plausibility of fusionism as a theoretical project of bridging the philosophical gap between libertarianism and free-market conservatism. Our thesis is that while fusionism could succeed, as a strategic alliance, in promoting specific policies, the differences between libertarianism and conservatism are irreconcilable at the level of fundamental intellectual assumptions. More precisely, starting from Hayeks objections to conservatism, we argue that the crucial divide is that between two conceptions about the prerequisites for social order. The second objective is to show how the differences between the policy prescriptions endorsed by conservatives and libertarians within the Tea Party (mainly with regard to religion-related issues) are illustrative for the theoretical point defended in the first sections.


Keywords


libertarianism, conservatism, religion and politics, social order, fusionism, Tea Party

Full Text: PDF

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.